�Ա���Ƶ

How do people experience government promoted ideas of peace after mass atrocity? , explores this question and more in (Yale University Press).

Skeptical about Western media claims of the inherent violence of the Rwandan people made during the 1994 genocide, Susan Thomson focused on the stories of those who lived through the atrocities in her second book on Rwanda. Thomson explores government-initiated programs for peace and reconciliation almost a decade following the genocide between the Hutu and Tutsi by highlighting the lived experiences of everyday Rwandans. She analyzes the historical factors which shaped present-day Rwanda and looks to the future.

“The western media had reported that this violence had erupted. Yet this word ‘erupted’ suggested that there was a match that was struck and the situation blew up,” Thomson said. “I was interested in learning about what would create violence between ethnic groups. This led me to talking to Rwandans themselves as I busied myself in learning the Kinyarwanda language — as I read the news reports that resulted in my PhD and my first book, .”

Thomson credits the support of the Peace and Conflict Studies department for aiding in the book coming to fruition.

“I have been very keen on Rwanda for a long time, although that is not usual in the academy,” explained Thomson. “Generally academics are supposed to do comparative case studies, to link what I learned from Rwanda to other cases. But �Ա���Ƶ colleagues have always said, ‘If you are interested in state power, in how people live in reconciling societies after war and genocide, go get it’. They gave me all the time and space I needed to write these two books.”

In teaching courses, including War and Lived Experiences and Gender in Peace and Conflict, Thomson incorporates her fieldwork into themes such as the ways gender shaped individual experiences of violence and the ethical concerns that arise when studying as an outsider. Beyond the classroom, Rwanda: From Genocide to Precarious Peace allows the general public to immerse themselves in this critical framework of acknowledging various perspectives as Thomson’s study is written with a popular audience in mind. Her book raises serious questions about the stability of the current peace, the methods and motivations of the ruling regime and its troubling ties to the past, and the outlook of the future.

“I’m trying to represent different points of view — not to make it more complicated — but to show that is complex and not just a bunch of ethnic Tutsis and ethnic Hutus.”